The Question
How Much Will the Bar Move in 2026?
Have you ever wondered how much faster this year’s state qualifying times are going to be? The bar moves almost every year. The question is how much.
I think about this because I don’t want to set a kid’s expectations wrong. If your athlete is aiming at a number that already got someone into state last year, and the bar tightens another half second this spring, you’ve quietly pointed them at the wrong target. You might even train a little differently if you knew where the cutoff was heading.
Now, obviously, every kid is trying as hard as they can. In some ways the point is moot — nobody runs a 1600 thinking, “I’ll go a little easier today because the cutoff hasn’t moved.” But it’s still interesting to see where these things might be heading for 2026, and it’s genuinely useful for the athletes and relays right on the bubble.
So I pulled four years of CHSAA heat sheets — 2022 through 2025, every Final Qualifier in every event, 5A through 1A, both genders. Then I looked at the trend and projected how much faster you might have to run, jump, or throw in 2026 to make the state championships.
None of this is set in stone. These are projections, not predictions, and the actual 2026 cutoff in any given event will land within a band, not on a digit. But the trends are real and the data is real. I’m going to grade myself in June after the state meet finishes and update this article with how close the projections came. Methodology in public, scorecard in public.
Method
Four Years of Heat Sheets, One Linear Trend
The math is simple. For each event, I took the 2022, 2023, 2024, and 2025 Final Qualifier numbers, computed the average year-over-year change, and added one more year. Where the trend is noisy — the 3200, the boys discus, anything that depends on a few standout athletes — the projection leans on the average of 2024 and 2025 rather than a strict linear extrapolation.
Weather matters. The 2022 state meet had a Friday afternoon high of 36°F with heavy snow at Jeffco. The 2025 girls 3200 backslide (11:00 to 11:08) is more likely a Saturday weather artifact than a real talent regression. Distance events and throws have wider error bars than sprints and jumps. I’ve flagged the noisy events.
Sprints in fully-automatic timing are the cleanest signal in the dataset. Field events — especially the jumps — are the second-cleanest. Distance is real but noisier.
If you want the full four-year history table for every event and every classification, that already lives at nextmilerecruiting.com/colorado-state-track. This article is the projection layer on top of it.
Honest Caveats
Where the Projections Are Most Likely Wrong
Before we show you any numbers, we want to be direct about the error bars.
Weather moves these numbers more than anything else. Cold, wet, and windy days slow distance races and tilt sprint and throw results in ways no trend line can predict. Coaches who were at Jeffco for any of the last four state meets remember exactly what conditions were like — we don’t need to relitigate it. We just want you to know we accounted for it.
If you want to see the actual conditions for every day of every state meet from 2022 to 2025, we built a free PDF. Temperature, sustained wind, gusts, precipitation, and humidity in two-hour increments from 8am to 8pm for every day of the championships. Useful for planning warmups, gear, and hydration — and for understanding why some years’ cutoffs look the way they do.
And finally: every event in this dataset only has four years of history. Four years isn’t a long time for a trend line. The projections are best read as “the likely direction and rough magnitude of the 2026 cutoff,” not as a single number that’s either right or wrong.
5A Cheat Sheet
The Numbers a 5A Athlete Should Aim At
This is the table I’d hand to a 5A coach in April. It shows last year’s Final Qualifier — what got into state in 2025 — next to the 2026 projection, with the gap between them. The gap is the difference between “where the bar was” and “where the bar is heading.”
5A Boys — 2025 Final Qualifier vs 2026 Projection
| Event | 2025 Cutoff | 2026 Projection | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 100m | 10.81 | 10.78 | −0.03 |
| 200m | 21.83 | 21.75 | −0.08 |
| 400m | 49.62 | 49.50 | −0.12 |
| 800m | 1:55.72 | 1:54.9 | −0.8 |
| 1600m | 4:20.00 | 4:18.5 | −1.5 |
| 3200m | 9:32.24 | 9:28 | −4 |
| 110m H | 15.07 | 14.95 | −0.12 |
| 300m H | 39.77 | 39.45 | −0.32 |
| High Jump | 6-03 | 6-04 | +1″ |
| Long Jump | 22-01.5 | 22-03 | +1.5″ |
| Triple Jump | 43-08.5 | 44-00 | +3.5″ |
| Pole Vault | 13-00 | 13-03 | +3″ |
| Shot Put | 47-05.5 | 48-02 | +8.5″ |
| Discus | 147-09 | 149-00 | +1′3″ |
| 4x100 | 42.23 | 41.90 | −0.33 |
| 4x200 | 1:28.21 | 1:27.5 | −0.7 |
| 4x400 | 3:24.37 | 3:23.0 | −1.4 |
| 4x800 | 8:03.94 | 7:58 | −6 |
5A Girls — 2025 Final Qualifier vs 2026 Projection
| Event | 2025 Cutoff | 2026 Projection | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 100m | 12.38 | 12.30 | −0.08 |
| 200m | 25.19 | 24.95 | −0.24 |
| 400m | 58.15 | 57.70 | −0.45 |
| 800m | 2:16.84 | 2:16.0 | −0.8 |
| 1600m | 5:06.37 | 5:05.0 | −1.4 |
| 3200m | 11:08.06 | 11:00 | −8 |
| 100m H | 15.51 | 15.35 | −0.16 |
| 300m H | 46.22 | 45.70 | −0.52 |
| High Jump | 5-02 | 5-03 | +1″ |
| Long Jump | 17-06 | 17-08 | +2″ |
| Triple Jump | 35-09.5 | 36-04 | +6.5″ |
| Pole Vault | 10-09 | 11-00 | +3″ |
| Shot Put | 34-11.25 | 34-11 | flat |
| Discus | 114-06 | 116-00 | +1′6″ |
| 4x100 | 49.28 | 48.95 | −0.33 |
| 4x200 | 1:43.86 | 1:43.0 | −0.9 |
| 4x400 | 4:02.47 | 4:01.0 | −1.5 |
| 4x800 | 9:45.47 | 9:42 | −3.5 |
Read the gap column. A −0.8 in the boys 800 means the projection is eight tenths faster than what got in last year. A girl who runs 5:06 in 2026 — exactly the 2025 cutoff — is probably still inside the field but on the bubble. A girl who runs 5:05 is comfortably in.
The events with the biggest gaps are the events most likely to leave athletes outside the field if they only chase last year’s number. Boys 4x800 (a six-second gap), boys 3200 (four), girls 3200 (eight), girls 200 and 400, both 300 hurdles. Those are the events where stretching the target now matters most.
Girls 5A shot put is the only event in the entire dataset where the cutoff has been essentially flat for four years. If I had to call one event where last year’s cutoff is a perfectly fine 2026 target, it’s that one.
Distance
The Fastest-Moving Group
If there’s one event area where last year’s qualifier is the worst possible 2026 target, it’s the boys 4x800 and the boys 800 in 5A and 4A.
Boys 4x800 in 5A has dropped from 8:27 to 8:13 to 8:08 to 8:03 in three years. That’s almost eight seconds a year. The 2026 projection is 7:58. A relay that runs 8:03 in 2026 — exactly the 2025 cutoff — probably misses the field by two or three spots. 4A is on the same trajectory: 8:26 to 8:17, projection 8:14.
Boys 800 in 5A has tightened almost a second a year for three straight years. Projection 1:54.9. A boy who runs 1:55.72 in 2026 is more likely to be the 19th or 20th seed than the 18th.
The girls side moves slower in the open 800 and 1600 but the direction is the same. Girls 4x800 in 5A has dropped exactly 10 seconds in four years, a textbook linear trend at 3.4 seconds per year. Projection 9:42.
The 3200 lines for both genders are noisier because of weather. Boys 5A went 9:46 to 9:34 to 9:25 to 9:32. Girls 5A went 11:22 to 11:12 to 11:00 to 11:08. Both backslid in 2025. Both projections are anchored to the recent two-year average rather than the strict linear fit.
Distance — 2025 Cutoff vs 2026 Projection (5A / 4A / 3A)
| Event | 5A 2025 | 5A Proj | 4A 2025 | 4A Proj | 3A 2025 | 3A Proj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boys 800 | 1:55.72 | 1:54.9 | 1:56.83 | 1:56.4 | 2:01.81 | 2:01.0 |
| Boys 1600 | 4:20.00 | 4:18.5 | 4:20.63 | 4:19.5 | 4:34.58 | 4:33.5 |
| Boys 3200 | 9:32.24 | 9:28 | 9:42.08 | 9:42 | 10:03.24 | 9:58 |
| Boys 4x800 | 8:03.94 | 7:58 | 8:17.85 | 8:14 | 8:36.48 | 8:33 |
| Girls 800 | 2:16.84 | 2:16.0 | 2:18.77 | 2:18.0 | 2:27.85 | 2:26.0 |
| Girls 1600 | 5:06.37 | 5:05.0 | 5:08.20 | 5:07.0 | 5:30.07 | 5:28 |
| Girls 3200 | 11:08.06 | 11:00 | 11:39.70 | 11:38 | 12:05.76 | 12:05 |
| Girls 4x800 | 9:45.47 | 9:42 | 10:02.21 | 9:56 | 10:27.51 | 10:20 |
Sprints
Faster Across the Board
The sprints are where the trend is most uniform. Almost every distance, every classification, every gender shows the qualifying bar dropping by hundredths or tenths each year. Fully-automatic timing is the cleanest signal in the dataset.
Boys 100 in 5A: 10.99 to 10.94 to 10.94 to 10.81. The 2025 jump of one and a third tenths was the largest single-year move in the four-year set. Projection 10.78.
Girls 200 in 5A: 25.88 to 26.00 to 25.96 to 25.19. The 2025 drop of nearly eight tenths was the biggest single-year move in the entire sprint dataset, period. Projection in the 24.95 range. If you’re looking at a sheet that says 25.21 will get a 5A girl into state in 2026, that sheet is probably a full tenth slow.
Girls 400 in 5A has dropped from 59.35 to 58.15. Steady. Projection 57.70.
Sprints — 2025 Cutoff vs 2026 Projection (5A / 4A / 3A)
| Event | 5A 2025 | 5A Proj | 4A 2025 | 4A Proj | 3A 2025 | 3A Proj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boys 100 | 10.81 | 10.78 | 11.09 | 11.07 | 11.24 | 11.20 |
| Boys 200 | 21.83 | 21.75 | 22.41 | 22.35 | 22.52 | 22.40 |
| Boys 400 | 49.62 | 49.50 | 50.25 | 50.00 | 50.73 | 50.30 |
| Girls 100 | 12.38 | 12.30 | 12.58 | 12.48 | 13.00 | 12.92 |
| Girls 200 | 25.19 | 24.95 | 25.72 | 25.40 | 26.45 | 26.10 |
| Girls 400 | 58.15 | 57.70 | 1:00.22 | 59.80 | 1:01.52 | 1:00.80 |
Hurdles
Volatile, but Trending Down
Hurdle qualifying times bounce around more than flat sprints. Hurdle racing is more technical, more weather-sensitive, more dependent on a handful of standout athletes per class. Even with that noise, the four-year trend is unmistakably down.
Boys 110H in 5A took the largest single-year drop of any 5A boys event in the dataset: 15.46 to 15.07 from 2024 to 2025, a near four-tenths plunge. Projection 14.95.
Boys 300H in 5A dropped from 41.13 to 39.77 across four years. Projection 39.45. Girls 100H 5A is dropping a quarter second every year like clockwork. Projection 15.35.
Hurdles — 2025 Cutoff vs 2026 Projection (5A / 4A / 3A)
| Event | 5A 2025 | 5A Proj | 4A 2025 | 4A Proj | 3A 2025 | 3A Proj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boys 110H | 15.07 | 14.95 | 15.22 | 15.00 | 16.53 | 16.40 |
| Boys 300H | 39.77 | 39.45 | 40.56 | 40.20 | 41.77 | 41.45 |
| Girls 100H | 15.51 | 15.35 | 16.29 | 16.15 | 16.97 | 16.80 |
| Girls 300H | 46.22 | 45.70 | 47.53 | 47.10 | 49.83 | 49.60 |
Field Events
Up Only
Every single field event in 5A — boys and girls, jumps and throws — has a higher qualifying bar in 2025 than in 2022. Field events tend to move up in steady increments because indoor training, year-round club coaching, and better technique coaching are accumulating across the high school population.
Boys high jump in 5A has gone up exactly one inch per year, four years running: 6-00, 6-01, 6-02, 6-03. Projection 6-04. That’s as clean a linear trend as anything in this dataset.
Boys pole vault in 5A jumped a full ten inches in 2025, from 12-02 to 13-00. The biggest single-year move of any 5A field event. Projection 13-03.
Boys triple jump 5A is up 14 inches in four years. Boys shot put 5A is up about eight inches a year. Boys discus 5A jumped almost seven feet in 2025 alone, which is almost certainly an outlier; the projection averages it down to 149 feet.
The girls field events are moving in the same direction at a slightly slower pace. Girls triple jump 5A has gained nearly two feet in four years (33-10 to 35-09). Girls pole vault 5A went from 9-09 to 10-09. Girls shot put is the lone exception — basically flat for four years.
Boys Field Events — 2025 Cutoff vs 2026 Projection (5A / 4A / 3A)
| Event | 5A 2025 | 5A Proj | 4A 2025 | 4A Proj | 3A 2025 | 3A Proj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High Jump | 6-03 | 6-04 | 6-02 | 6-02 | 6-00.50 | 6-01 |
| Long Jump | 22-01.50 | 22-03 | 21-07.50 | 21-09 | 20-06.50 | 20-08 |
| Triple Jump | 43-08.50 | 44-00 | 41-09 | 42-04 | 40-09 | 40-09 |
| Pole Vault | 13-00 | 13-03 | 12-03 | 12-05 | 11-07 | 11-09 |
| Shot Put | 47-05.50 | 48-02 | 47-00 | 47-04 | 43-08 | 44-04 |
| Discus | 147-09 | 149-00 | 142-02 | 143-06 | 130-06 | 132-00 |
Girls Field Events — 2025 Cutoff vs 2026 Projection (5A / 4A / 3A)
| Event | 5A 2025 | 5A Proj | 4A 2025 | 4A Proj | 3A 2025 | 3A Proj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High Jump | 5-02 | 5-03 | 5-00 | 5-00 | 5-00 | 5-00 |
| Long Jump | 17-06 | 17-08 | 16-08 | 16-11 | 16-00.50 | 16-02 |
| Triple Jump | 35-09.50 | 36-04 | 34-08 | 34-10 | 33-00 | 33-03 |
| Pole Vault | 10-09 | 11-00 | 9-04 | 9-05 | 7-08 | 7-07 |
| Shot Put | 34-11.25 | 34-11 | 34-07.50 | 35-00 | 33-04 | 33-04 |
| Discus | 114-06 | 116-00 | 105-00 | 108-00 | 106-09 | 107-00 |
Relays
All Four Relays Tighter Than Last Year
The relays follow the same pattern as the open events. Every 5A relay cutoff in 2025 is tighter than 2022, and every projection for 2026 is tighter than 2025. The biggest movers are the boys and girls 4x800, which I covered in the distance section.
Relays — 2025 Cutoff vs 2026 Projection (5A / 4A / 3A)
| Event | 5A 2025 | 5A Proj | 4A 2025 | 4A Proj | 3A 2025 | 3A Proj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boys 4x100 | 42.23 | 41.90 | 43.36 | 43.15 | 44.41 | 44.20 |
| Boys 4x200 | 1:28.21 | 1:27.50 | 1:30.03 | 1:29.40 | 1:31.84 | 1:31.20 |
| Boys 4x400 | 3:24.37 | 3:23.0 | 3:28.62 | 3:27.0 | 3:31.66 | 3:30.0 |
| Boys 4x800 | 8:03.94 | 7:58 | 8:17.85 | 8:14 | 8:36.48 | 8:33 |
| Girls 4x100 | 49.28 | 48.95 | 50.47 | 50.20 | 51.36 | 50.90 |
| Girls 4x200 | 1:43.86 | 1:43.00 | 1:46.57 | 1:45.80 | 1:49.79 | 1:49.00 |
| Girls 4x400 | 4:02.47 | 4:01.0 | 4:10.24 | 4:09.0 | 4:20.62 | 4:19.5 |
| Girls 4x800 | 9:45.47 | 9:42 | 10:02.21 | 9:56 | 10:27.51 | 10:20 |
Scorecard
We’ll Grade Ourselves in June
The Colorado state meet is in mid-May. As soon as the actual 2026 Final Qualifier numbers are public, we’ll come back to this article and add a column showing where the projections landed. Hits, misses, and the magnitude of each.
If the projections are mostly right, that’s useful for planning the 2027 article. If they’re mostly wrong, that’s also useful — it tells us the four-year linear trend isn’t the right model and we need a better one.
Either way, the scorecard goes in this article so you can see it.
For Coaches: Share This With Your Families
If you have athletes or parents asking about the recruiting process, we built something for them. It covers the most common mistakes families make when their athlete starts reaching out to college coaches, and it’s free.
You can send them this link directly:
nextmilerecruiting.com/2-mistakes
Read the Free GuideAbout Jay Johnson
Jay Johnson is the founder of Next Mile Recruiting. He has over 25 years of coaching experience, including time as a Division I recruiting coordinator at the University of Colorado. He has coached athletes from college through the professional level and currently works with distance running families navigating the college recruiting process. He lives in Denver, Colorado, and has a teenage daughter going through this process.
Learn more at nextmilerecruiting.com or send your questions to info@nextmilerecruiting.com.
Prepared by Next Mile Recruiting · April 7, 2026